A:
Building a new and successful company is very challenging and the rewards, when they come, are well deserved. What can happen, however, as the business plan calls for more and more funding is that the percentage of the company owned by the founders and the executive management is reduced by successive rounds of equity financing. Dilution, in other words, becomes a real issue; not just for the management team but also the existing institutional shareholders. But if Venture Debt is used, in substitution for part or all of a proposed equity round or as a bridge between equity rounds, the early stage investors and those who run the business can keep a greater proportion of the company than would be the case if the funds required were made available solely by venture capitalists. The key points are:
- it lowers the total cost of capital to the company;
- it allows the company to change the timing of its equity rounds to benefit current shareholders and minimise dilution;
- it does not affect the valuation and does not distract management as much as raising equity ; and
- is much faster than an equity round to implement, with lower completion risk.